Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase I trial of co-administered pyronaridine and piperaquine in healthy adults of sub-Saharan origin.

Drug resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine threatens the efficacy of malaria chemoprevention interventions in children and pregnant women. Combining pyronaridine (PYR) and piperaquine (PQP), both components of approved antimalarial therapies, has the potential to protect vulnerable populations from severe malaria. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (double-dummy), parallel-group, single site phase I study in healthy adult males or females of Black sub-Saharan African ancestry investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PYR + PQP (n = 15), PYR + placebo (n = 8), PQP + placebo (n = 8), and double placebo (n = 6) administered orally once daily for 3 days at the registered dose for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. All participants completed the study. Forty-five adverse events were reported in 26 participants, most (41/45) were mild/moderate in severity, with no serious adverse events, deaths, or study withdrawals. Adverse events were reported in 66.7% (10/15) of participants administered PYR + PQP, 87.5% (7/8) with PYR + placebo, 50.0% (4/8) with PQP + placebo, and 83.3% (5/6) with placebo. For PYR containing regimens, five of 23 participants had asymptomatic transient increases in alanine and/or aspartate aminotransferase. With PQP containing regimens, four of 23 participants had mild Fridericia-corrected QT interval prolongation. Liver enzyme elevations and prolonged QTc interval were consistent with observations for PYR-artesunate and dihydroartemisinin-PQP, respectively, administered to healthy adults and malaria patients. Increases in PYR and PQP exposures were observed following co-administration versus placebo, with substantial interparticipant variability. The findings suggest that PYR + PQP may have potential in chemoprevention strategies. Further studies are needed in the target populations to assess chemoprotective efficacy and define the benefit-risk profile, with special considerations regarding hepatic and cardiac safety.

Safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnant women with HIV from Gabon and Mozambique: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The cornerstone of malaria prevention in pregnancy, intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, is contraindicated in women with HIV who are receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis. We assessed whether IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is safe and effective in reducing the risk of malaria infection in women with HIV receiving co-trimoxazole prophylaxis and antiretroviral drugs. METHODS: For this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, women with HIV attending the first antenatal care clinic visit, resident in the study area, and with a gestational age up to 28 weeks were enrolled at five sites in Gabon and Mozambique. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine at each scheduled antenatal care visit plus daily co-trimoxazole (intervention group) or placebo at each scheduled antenatal care visit plus daily co-trimoxazole (control group). Randomisation was done centrally via block randomisation (block sizes of eight), stratified by country. IPTp was given over 3 days under direct observation by masked study personnel. The number of daily IPTp tablets was based on bodyweight and according to the treatment guidelines set by WHO (target dose of 4 mg/kg per day [range 2-10 mg/kg per day] of dihydroartemisinin and 18 mg/kg per day [range 16-27 mg/kg per day] of piperaquine given once a day for 3 days). At enrolment, all participants received co-trimoxazole (fixed combination drug containing 800 mg trimethoprim and 160 mg sulfamethoxazole) for daily intake. The primary study outcome was prevalence of peripheral parasitaemia detected by microscopy at delivery. The modified intention-to-treat population included all randomly assigned women who had data for the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included frequency of adverse events, incidence of clinical malaria during pregnancy, and frequency of poor pregnancy outcomes. All study personnel, investigators, outcome assessors, data analysts, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03671109. FINDINGS: From Sept 18, 2019, to Nov 26, 2021, 666 women (mean age 28·5 years [SD 6·4]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the intervention (n=332) and control (n=334) groups. 294 women in the intervention group and 308 women in the control group had peripheral blood samples taken at delivery and were included in the primary analysis. Peripheral parasitaemia at delivery was detected in one (<1%) of 294 women in the intervention group and none of 308 women in the control group. The incidence of clinical malaria during pregnancy was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (one episode in the intervention group vs six in the control group; relative risk [RR] 0·12, 95% CI 0·03-0·52, p=0·045). In a post-hoc analysis, the composite outcome of overall malaria infection (detected by any diagnostic test during pregnancy or delivery) was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (14 [5%] of 311 women vs 31 [10%] of 320 women; RR 0·48, 95% CI 0·27-0·84, p=0·010). The frequency of serious adverse events and poor pregnancy outcomes (such as miscarriages, stillbirths, premature births, and congenital malformations) did not differ between groups. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal disorder (reported in less than 4% of participants) and headache (reported in less than 2% of participants), with no differences between study groups. INTERPRETATION: In the context of low malaria transmission, the addition of IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in pregnant women with HIV did not reduce peripheral parasitaemia at delivery. However, the intervention was safe and associated with a decreased risk of clinical malaria and overall Plasmodium falciparum infection, so it should be considered as a strategy to protect pregnant women with HIV from malaria. FUNDING: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2 (EDCTP2) and Medicines for Malaria Venture. TRANSLATIONS: For the Portuguese and French translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Ganaplacide (KAF156) plus lumefantrine solid dispersion formulation combination for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: an open-label, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Emergence of drug resistance demands novel antimalarial drugs with new mechanisms of action. We aimed to identify effective and well tolerated doses of ganaplacide plus lumefantrine solid dispersion formulation (SDF) in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. METHODS: This open-label, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted at 13 research clinics and general hospitals in ten African and Asian countries. Patients had microscopically-confirmed uncomplicated P falciparum malaria (>1000 and <150 000 parasites per µL). Part A identified the optimal dose regimens in adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years) and in part B, the selected doses were assessed in children (≥2 years and <12 years). In part A, patients were randomly assigned to one of seven groups (once a day ganaplacide 400 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 960 mg for 1, 2, or 3 days; ganaplacide 800 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 960 mg as a single dose; once a day ganaplacide 200 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 480 mg for 3 days; once a day ganaplacide 400 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 480 mg for 3 days; or twice a day artemether plus lumefantrine for 3 days [control]), with stratification by country (2:2:2:2:2:2:1) using randomisation blocks of 13. In part B, patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups (once a day ganaplacide 400 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 960 mg for 1, 2, or 3 days, or twice a day artemether plus lumefantrine for 3 days) with stratification by country and age (2 to <6 years and 6 to <12 years; 2:2:2:1) using randomisation blocks of seven. The primary efficacy endpoint was PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response at day 29, analysed in the per protocol set. The null hypothesis was that the response was 80% or lower, rejected when the lower limit of two-sided 95% CI was higher than 80%. This study is registered with EudraCT (2020-003284-25) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03167242). FINDINGS: Between Aug 2, 2017, and May 17, 2021, 1220 patients were screened and of those, 12 were included in the run-in cohort, 337 in part A, and 175 in part B. In part A, 337 adult or adolescent patients were randomly assigned, 326 completed the study, and 305 were included in the per protocol set. The lower limit of the 95% CI for PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response on day 29 was more than 80% for all treatment regimens in part A (46 of 50 patients [92%, 95% CI 81-98] with 1 day, 47 of 48 [98%, 89-100] with 2 days, and 42 of 43 [98%, 88-100] with 3 days of ganaplacide 400 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 960 mg; 45 of 48 [94%, 83-99] with ganaplacide 800 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 960 mg for 1 day; 47 of 47 [100%, 93-100] with ganaplacide 200 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 480 mg for 3 days; 44 of 44 [100%, 92-100] with ganaplacide 400 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 480 mg for 3 days; and 25 of 25 [100%, 86-100] with artemether plus lumefantrine). In part B, 351 children were screened, 175 randomly assigned (ganaplacide 400 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 960 mg once a day for 1, 2, or 3 days), and 171 completed the study. Only the 3-day regimen met the prespecified primary endpoint in paediatric patients (38 of 40 patients [95%, 95% CI 83-99] vs 21 of 22 [96%, 77-100] with artemether plus lumefantrine). The most common adverse events were headache (in seven [14%] of 51 to 15 [28%] of 54 in the ganaplacide plus lumefantrine-SDF groups and five [19%] of 27 in the artemether plus lumefantrine group) in part A, and malaria (in 12 [27%] of 45 to 23 [44%] of 52 in the ganaplacide plus lumefantrine-SDF groups and 12 [50%] of 24 in the artemether plus lumefantrine group) in part B. No patients died during the study. INTERPRETATION: Ganaplacide plus lumefantrine-SDF was effective and well tolerated in patients, especially adults and adolescents, with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria. Ganaplacide 400 mg plus lumefantrine-SDF 960 mg once daily for 3 days was identified as the optimal treatment regimen for adults, adolescents, and children. This combination is being evaluated further in a phase 2 trial (NCT04546633). FUNDING: Novartis and Medicines for Malaria Venture.

Safety, Tolerability, and Parasite Clearance Kinetics in Controlled Human Malaria Infection after Direct Venous Inoculation of Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoites: A Model for Evaluating New Blood-Stage Antimalarial Drugs.

Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite (PfSPZ) direct venous inoculation (DVI) using cryopreserved, infectious PfSPZ (PfSPZ Challenge [Sanaria, Rockville, Maryland]) is an established controlled human malaria infection model. However, to evaluate new chemical entities with potential blood-stage activity, more detailed data are needed on safety, tolerability, and parasite clearance kinetics for DVI of PfSPZ Challenge with established schizonticidal antimalarial drugs. This open-label, phase Ib study enrolled 16 malaria-naïve healthy adults in two cohorts (eight per cohort). Following DVI of 3,200 PfSPZ (NF54 strain), parasitemia was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) from day 7. The approved antimalarial artemether-lumefantrine was administered at a qPCR-defined target parasitemia of ≥ 5,000 parasites/mL of blood. The intervention was generally well tolerated, with two grade 3 adverse events of neutropenia, and no serious adverse events. All 16 participants developed parasitemia after a mean of 9.7 days (95% CI 9.1-10.4) and a mean parasitemia level of 511 parasites/mL (95% CI 369-709). The median time to reach ≥ 5,000 parasites/mL was 11.5 days (95% CI 10.4-12.4; Kaplan-Meier), at that point the geometric mean (GM) parasitemia was 15,530 parasites/mL (95% CI 10,268-23,488). Artemether-lumefantrine was initiated at a GM of 12.1 days (95% CI 11.5-12.7), and a GM parasitemia of 6,101 parasites/mL (1,587-23,450). Mean parasite clearance time was 1.3 days (95% CI 0.9-2.1) and the mean log10 parasite reduction ratio over 48 hours was 3.6 (95% CI 3.4-3.7). This study supports the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of PfSPZ Challenge by DVI for evaluating the blood-stage activity of candidate antimalarial drugs.

Re-orienting anti-malarial drug development to better serve pregnant women.

Malaria is one of the most serious infectious diseases affecting predominantly low- and middle-income countries, where pregnant women are among the populations at risk. There are limited options to prevent or treat malaria in pregnancy, particularly in the first trimester, and existing ones may not work optimally in areas where the threat of drug resistance is rising. As malaria elimination is a key goal of the global health community, the inclusion of pregnant women in the adult population to protect from malaria will be key to achieving success. New, safe, and effective options are needed but it can take decades of evidence-gathering before a medicine is recommended for use in pregnancy. This is because pregnant women are typically not included in pre-registration clinical trials due to fear of causing harm. Data to support dosing and safety in pregnancy are subsequently collected in post-licensure studies. There have been growing calls in recent years that this practice needs to change, amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and increasing public awareness that newly developed medicines generally cannot be administered to pregnant women from the onset. The development of new anti-malarials should ensure that data informing their use in pregnancy and breastfeeding are available earlier. To achieve this, a mindset change and a different approach to medications for pregnant women are needed. Changes in non-clinical, translational, and clinical approaches in the drug development pathway, in line with recent recommendations from the regulatory bodies are proposed in this Comment. The new approach applies to any malaria-endemic region, regardless of the type of Plasmodium responsible for malaria cases. By incorporating intentional and systematic data collection from pre-registration stages of development through post-licensure, it will be possible to inform on the benefit/risk balance of a new anti-malarial earlier and help ensure that the needs of pregnant individuals are addressed in a more timely and equitable manner in the future.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Coadministered Ruxolitinib and Artemether-Lumefantrine in Healthy Adults.

Despite repeated malaria infection, individuals living in areas where malaria is endemic remain vulnerable to reinfection. The Janus kinase (JAK1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib could potentially disrupt the parasite-induced dysfunctional immune response when administered with antimalarial therapy. This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center phase 1 trial investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of ruxolitinib and the approved antimalarial artemether-lumefantrine in combination. Ruxolitinib pharmacodynamics were assessed by inhibition of phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3). Eight healthy male and female participants ages 18 to 55 years were randomized to either ruxolitinib (20 mg) (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2) administered 2 h after artemether-lumefantrine (80/480 mg) twice daily for 3 days. Mild adverse events occurred in six participants (four ruxolitinib; two placebo). The combination of artemether-lumefantrine and ruxolitinib was well tolerated, with adverse events and pharmacokinetics consistent with the known profiles of both drugs. The incidence of adverse events and artemether, dihydroartemisinin (the major active metabolite of artemether), and lumefantrine exposure were not affected by ruxolitinib coadministration. Ruxolitinib coadministration resulted in a 3-fold-greater pSTAT3 inhibition compared to placebo (geometric mean ratio = 3.01 [90% confidence interval = 2.14 to 4.24]), with a direct and predictable relationship between ruxolitinib plasma concentrations and %pSTAT3 inhibition. This study supports the investigation of the combination of artemether-lumefantrine and ruxolitinib in healthy volunteers infected with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04456634.).

Concentration-QT modelling of the novel DHFR inhibitor P218 in healthy male volunteers.

AIMS: Given the increasing emergence of drug resistance in Plasmodium, new antimalarials are urgently required. P218 is an aminopyridine that inhibits dihydrofolate reductase being developed as a malaria chemoprotective drug. Assessing the effect of new compounds on cardiac intervals is key during early drug development to determine their cardiac safety. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study evaluated the effect of P218 on electrocardiographic parameters following oral administration of seven single-ascending doses up to 1000 mg in 56 healthy volunteers. Participants were randomized to treatment or placebo at a 3:1 ratio. P218 was administered in the fasted state with standardized lunch served 4 hours after dosing. 12-lead ECGs were recorded in triplicate at regular intervals on the test day, and at 48, 72, 120, 168, 192 and 240 hours thereafter. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluations were collected at similar time points. Concentration-effect modelling was used to assess the effect of P218 and its metabolites on cardiac intervals. RESULTS: Concentration-effect analysis showed that P218 does not prolong the QTcF, J-Tpeak or TpTe interval at all doses tested. No significant changes in QRS or PR intervals were observed. Two-sided 90% confidence intervals of subinterval effects of P218 and its metabolites were consistently below the regulatory concern threshold for all doses. Study sensitivity was confirmed by significant shortening of QTcF after a meal. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of P218 up to 1000 mg does not prolong QTcF and does not significantly change QRS or PR intervals, suggesting low risk for drug-induced proarrhythmia.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in HIV-infected pregnant women: protocol of a multicentre, two-arm, randomised, placebo-controlled, superiority clinical trial (MAMAH project).

INTRODUCTION: Malaria infection during pregnancy is an important driver of maternal and neonatal health especially among HIV-infected women. Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine is recommended for malaria prevention in HIV-uninfected women, but it is contraindicated in those HIV-infected on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (CTXp) due to potential adverse effects. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) has been shown to improve antimalarial protection, constituting a promising IPTp candidate. This trial's objective is to determine if monthly 3-day IPTp courses of DHA-PPQ added to daily CTXp are safe and superior to CTXp alone in decreasing the proportion of peripheral malaria parasitaemia at the end of pregnancy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, two-arm, placebo-controlled, individually randomised trial in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving CTXp and antiretroviral treatment. A total of 664 women will be enrolled at the first antenatal care clinic visit in sites from Gabon and Mozambique. Participants will receive an insecticide-treated net, and they will be administered monthly IPTp with DHA-PPQ or placebo (1:1 ratio) as directly observed therapy from the second trimester of pregnancy. Primary study outcome is the prevalence of maternal parasitaemia at delivery. Secondary outcomes include prevalence of malaria-related maternal and infant outcomes and proportion of adverse perinatal outcomes. Participants will be followed until 6 weeks after the end of pregnancy and their infants until 1 year of age to also evaluate the impact of DHA-PPQ on mother-to-child transmission of HIV. The analysis will be done in the intention to treat and according to protocol cohorts, adjusted by gravidity, country, seasonality and other variables associated with malaria. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional and national ethics committees of Gabon and Mozambique and the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Project results will be presented to all stakeholders and published in open-access journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03671109.

Chemoprotective Antimalarial Activity of P218 against Plasmodium falciparum: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Volunteer Infection Study.

P218 is a highly selective dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor with potent in vitro activity against pyrimethamine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ib study evaluated P218 safety, pharmacokinetics, and chemoprotective efficacy in a P. falciparum sporozoite (PfSPZ) volunteer infection study (VIS). Consecutive dose safety and tolerability were evaluated (cohort 1), with participants receiving two oral doses of P218 1,000 mg 48 hours apart (n = 6), or placebo (n = 2). P218 chemoprotective efficacy was assessed (cohorts 2 and 3) with direct venous inoculation of 3,200 aseptic, cryopreserved PfSPZ (NF54 strain) followed 2 hours later with two P218 doses of 1,000 mg (cohort 2, n = 9) or 100 mg (cohort 3, n = 9) administered 48 hours apart, or placebo (n = 6). Parasitemia was assessed from day 7 using quantitative PCR targeting the var gene acidic terminal sequence (varATS qPCR). By day 28, all participants in cohort 2 (P218 1,000 mg) and 8/9 in cohort 3 (P218 100 mg) were sterilely protected post-PfSPZ VIS, confirming P218 P. falciparum chemoprotective activity. With placebo, all six participants became parasitemic (geometric mean time to positive parasitemia 10.6 days [90% CI: 9.9-11.4]). P218 pharmacokinetics were similar in participants with or without induced infection. Adverse events of any cause occurred in 45.8% (11/24) of participants who received P218 and 50.0% (4/8) following placebo; all were mild/moderate in severity, transient, and self-limiting. There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters, vital signs, or electrocardiograms. P218 displayed excellent chemoprotective efficacy against P. falciparum with favorable safety and tolerability.

First-in-human clinical trial to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of P218, a novel candidate for malaria chemoprotection.

AIMS: This first-in-human clinical trial of P218, a novel dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor antimalarial candidate, assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and food effects in healthy subjects. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts. Part A was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, ascending dose study comprising seven fasted cohorts. Eight subjects/cohort were randomized (3:1) to receive either a single oral dose of P218 (10, 30, 100, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg) or placebo. Part B was an open-label, cross-over, fed/fasted cohort (eight subjects) that received a 250 mg single dose of P218 in two treatment periods. RESULTS: P218 was generally well tolerated across all doses; 21 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 15/64 subjects. Nine adverse events in five subjects, all of mild intensity, were judged drug related. No clinically relevant abnormalities in ECG, vital signs or laboratory tests changes were observed. P218 was rapidly absorbed, with Cmax achieved between 0.5 and 2 hours post dose. Plasma concentrations declined bi-exponentially with half-life values ranging from 3.1 to 6.7 hours (10 and 30 mg), increasing up to 8.9 to 19.6 hours (doses up to 1000 mg). Exposure values increased dose-proportionally between 100 and 1000 mg for P218 (parent) and three primary metabolites (P218 ß-acyl glucuronide, P218-OH and P218-OH ß-acyl glucuronide). Co-administration of P218 with food reduced Cmax by 35% and delayed absorption by 1 hour, with no significant impact on AUC. CONCLUSION: P218 displayed favourable safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics. In view of its short half-life, a long-acting formulation will be needed for malaria chemoprotection.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and safety of bosutinib in patients with chronic hepatic impairment and matched healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Bosutinib, a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor in development for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia, is primarily metabolized by the CYP3A4 hepatic enzyme. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of bosutinib in patients with chronic hepatic impairment and matched healthy subjects. METHODS: Hepatically impaired patients were aged 18-65 years and of Child-Pugh classes A, B, or C; healthy subjects were matched by age, sex, body mass index, and smoking habits. A single oral dose of bosutinib 200 mg was administered on day 1 within 5 min after completion of breakfast. RESULTS: Compared with healthy subjects (n = 9), maximal plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve increased 2.42-fold and 2.25-fold in Child-Pugh A (n = 6), 1.99-fold and 2.0-fold in Child-Pugh B (n = 6), and 1.52-fold and 1.91-fold in Child-Pugh C patients (n = 6). Time to C(max) decreased from 4 h in healthy subjects to 2.5, 2.0, and 1.5 h in Child-Pugh A, B, and C patients, respectively; the elimination half-life increased from 55 h in healthy subjects to 86, 113, and 111 h in Child-Pugh A, B, and C patients. Bosutinib oral clearance was lower in hepatically impaired patients compared with healthy subjects. Frequently reported adverse events included prolonged QTc interval (37.0%, n = 10), nausea (11.1%, n = 3), and vomiting (7.4%, n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: A single oral dose of bosutinib 200 mg showed acceptable tolerability in healthy subjects and in patients with mild, moderate, or severe chronic hepatic impairment.

Ascending single-dose study of the safety profile, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of bosutinib coadministered with ketoconazole to healthy adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: Bosutinib (SKI-606) is an orally bioavailable, competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets both Src and Abl tyrosine kinases. Bosutinib is metabolized primarily through the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway. Inhibition of bosutinib metabolism by coadministration with the potent cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole could potentially increase plasma concentrations of bosutinib, allowing for the study of bosutinib tolerability at supratherapeutic concentrations in a healthy subject population. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the safety profile, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of different dose combinations of bosutinib coadministered with ketoconazole in healthy adults, and determined whether supratherapeutic concentrations of bosutinib can be achieved with ketoconazole. METHODS: This was a randomized, Phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential-group study conducted in healthy adults. Single oral doses of bosutinib 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 mg or placebo were administered with ketoconazole and food on day 1; daily single oral doses of ketoconazole 400 mg were administered on days -1 and 1 through 4. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were enrolled. Their mean (SD) age was 32.0 (10.7) years (range, 18-50 years). The majority of the subjects (n = 44 [92%]) were white, 2 (4%) were black or African American, and 2 (4%) were of other races. Bosutinib was associated with acceptable tolerability at doses from 100 to 600 mg, with adverse events either mild (n = 30 [63%]) or moderate (n = 12 [25%]) in severity; no subject discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and no serious events were reported. Mean (SD) values for bosutinib 100 to 600 mg ranged from 58.4 (13.3) to 426 (100) ng/mL for C(max) and 2980 (802) to 23,000 (4020) ng·h/mL for AUC(0-∞); mean AUC(0-24) and AUC(0-last) ranged from 876 (234) to 7080 (1640) ng· h/mL and from 2740 (854) to 22,200 (3630) ng · h/mL, respectively. C(max) and AUC were linear and dose proportional. Mean C(max) at 600 mg was 2.1-fold higher than the steady-state C(max) previously observed for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia who received bosutinib 500 mg once daily with food. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of bosutinib up to 600 mg coadministered with multiple doses of ketoconazole were acceptably well tolerated in this small, selected group of healthy male volunteers. In addition, supratherapeutic exposure was achieved within this range for bosutinib when coadministered with ketoconazole. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00777530.